National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders: Name Change Needed?
In the August 2008 issue of Maxim magazine, the
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
responded to a reader's question by confirming that MP3 players and earbuds can cause permanent damage to your ears.
Nice little public service announcement there, yes.
But, hello, am I the only one who's offended?
Look, I'm not all that familiar with NIDCD, but I'm sure they've helped countless people with bona fide communication disorders
and other medical issues. I also understand they're a member of National Institutes of Health (NIH), which is nothing to scoff at.
At the same time: Isn't it kind of rude to lump "deafness" together with "other communication disorders?" Hello? Excuse me?
I'm serious. I'm at a loss for words (now that's a first). It took me several minutes to type this far. I keep looking at
Deafness and Other Communication Disorders and its so maddening I don't know where to begin.
This is not the first time I've reacted this way upon reading a news blurb from the National Institute on Deafness and, uh, urk,
ack, errr, uhhh, Other Communication Disorders. I've bit my tongue (or sat on my hands) in the past out of respect for certain people each time it happened. But the truth remains: Every time I see "and Other Communication Disorders" I really do feel offended.
Am I getting through to anyone yet? Yes? No?
All right, let's play a little game of Perspective.
If National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders is acceptable, I say it's time we jump on the bandwagon and expand on this for the betterment of society. How about if for good measure we set up the following new organizations:
National Institute on Racial Diversity and Other Pigment Disorders
National Institute on Women and Other Penis Disorders
National Institute on Religion and Other Delusional Disorders
National Institute on Politics and Other Pathological Lying Disorders
Have I offended anyone? Good! That's how I feel when I see "and Other Communication Disorders" attached to the community where I
Need I go on? Hell yes, I will. I'm having too much fun with this.
I'm deaf as a post. If you're reading this, we're connecting somehow. I made a point, and you got it. Doesn't matter if you agree
or disagree. Holy crap, we communicated! Congratulations.
My ability to communicate isn't limited to the Internet. If you want to stay on a technical level you could add e-mail, pager,
videophone, and whatnot. But I want to emphasize that I do pretty well in person, too. Ditto for my family, several of whom are deaf.
We communicate just fine with each other. In two languages. I also know other deaf people who are fluent in as many as four different
Have I made it clear yet that being deaf in itself is not a communication disorder?
I know, I know. Some hands are raised in objection. Someone out there no doubt wants to point out that deafness can pose a communication
barrier between the deaf and hearing, and by that logic we have a communication disorder.
Um, let's go back to square one.
I'm deaf as a post. If you're reading this, and you're a hearing person, we're connecting somehow. I made a point, and you got it.
Doesn't matter if you agree or disagree. Doesn't matter if you're hearing and I'm deaf. Holy crap, we communicated! Congratulations.
And the deaf/hearing communication barrier isn't smashed just on the Internet. If you want to stay on a technical level you could
add e-mail, pager, videophone, and whatnot. A certain percentage of the deaf community will also use any number of assistive devices.
Others will improvise and find another way. The latter applies to my family - none of us wear so much as a hearing aid but we
communicate just fine with hearing relatives, neighbors, friends, and so on. Where's the communication disorder?
If you introduced me to someone new and I promptly started barking, then you could make an argument that I had a communication disorder. If I greeted people by sniffing their armpits or insisted on perpetually ordering my Happy Meal in Klingon, then likewise you'd have a good case.
But no, I and every deaf person I know tend to do just fine communicating with each other and the world at large, thank you very much. So pardon me if I get offended when I see the name National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders.
Look, I know there are very real communication disorders and NIDCD does us a great service by addressing them. I'm all for it, and my hat's off to them in that respect. I'll be the first to tell you that most likely there are a lot of good things NIDCD does that I'm not aware of (I'd be more aware if I wasn't immediately turned off by their name, which is why I'm suggesting a change).
And there is indeed a certain communication disorder - no, wait a minute, make that communication delay that takes place when some parents aren't sure what to do when their newborn baby is identified as deaf. There are a lot of communication non-disordered deaf people out there who can be great resources in this area. They might be more inclined to help if there was a little name change. Perhaps it would make more sense to name this organization National Institute on Communication Disorders and leave it at that.
Just my two cents.
Two cents that were communicated quite clearly, I hope.
What Other Visitors Have Said
Click below to see contributions from other visitors to this page...
I totally agree!
I'm looking to learn ASL and when I read the name of the institution my jaw hit the ground. I have known enough deaf people and read enough to know that …
How is being deaf not a disorder?
I am an speech-language pathologist student and I love sign language with a passion. I have read many blogs, articles, and video comments about how insulting …
Yes and you won't believe this. I learned recently at the DBC conference that Deaf babies' 'fate' are often decided by EHDI (Early Hearing Detection and …
NIH's isn't the only one...
NIH's isn't the only one. Many other entities lump Deafness with Communication Disorders or something to similar effects. I think even Gallaudet, RIT and …
Yep! Why? Audism at work! AGB plays up being Deaf as being "communicatively handicapped" (another nice audistic term that's been slapped on us Deafies!) …
A bit of history
I think that we should look at a bit of history behind the name of the institute. According to http://history.nih.gov/01Docs/historical/2020c.htm , National …
Alright, it is officially time to petition the US Government workers to turn in their cards that give them the right to drive, eat, sleep, and procreate.... …
I also see deafness being lumped with the communication disorders in the college catalogs. I evaluate the college transcripts. I often see them. I often …
The Drolzman has presented us with yet another thought-provoking post.
Whoever came up with that phrase "Sticks and stones may break my bones but words …